In a recent Twitter post, Ammar Khan, dissects the crux of the issues inherent within the top 25 companies as listed by the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for the year 2022. In an era where the lines between state intervention and corporate independence blur consistently, Khan’s revelations offer an invaluable perspective that demands a closer examination.
Government’s Invisible Hand in Corporate Affairs
To begin with, Khan’s revelations shed light on the evident inclination of some of these top-ranking corporations towards the state’s largesse. Take for instance FFC and EFERT, both of which, according to Khan, rely significantly on subsidized gas. While subsidies may be framed as a supportive mechanism for fledgling industries or sectors in distress, their use in bolstering the prospects of top-tier companies raises questions. If state interference rather than actual market dynamics is supporting their position, can we genuinely label them as market leaders?
Another compelling observation is how companies like Engro Corp have elements of state support intertwined with almost every business branch. Such an entangled relationship not only highlights the potential for conflicts of interest but also throws into doubt the authenticity of their market position.
The Few Against the Many
However, Khan does give credit where it’s due. Systems, for instance, operates in a fiercely competitive market and has seemingly earned its place among the top without undue governmental crutches. Similarly, companies like Archroma and CPPL also function within a competitive sphere, reinforcing the belief that success without state reliance isn’t just possible but commendable.
The Mockery of Autonomy
Yet, the sheer extent of government interference in some sectors is almost comical, if not deeply concerning. Security Paper, as Khan amusingly points out, has the primary task of printing currency notes for the State Bank of Pakistan. Similarly, the likes of HBL, BAFL, HMB, and UBL derive a staggering 70% of their income from government assets. The reliance of these behemoths on state treasure is not just a testament to the deep-rooted connections between the state and the corporate sector but also underscores the latent vulnerabilities within these businesses should the state decide to shift its priorities.
Government’s Dalliance with Oligopolies
The state’s hesitance to challenge existing oligopolies is another pressing concern. CHCC, operating in an oligopoly, remains undisturbed primarily due to governmental reluctance. Such inaction not only stymies competition but also stagnates industries, which in turn impacts innovation, pricing, and consumer choice.
Khan’s scrutiny culminates in a startling revelation – out of the top 25, only about five operate within a genuinely competitive environment without significant governmental dependence. Essentially, this implies that a whopping 80% of these ‘top companies’ have the government playing a crucial role in their success.
So, where does this leave us? Do these revelations undermine the achievements of these corporations, or do they underscore a more significant systemic issue? Perhaps it’s a blend of both. While these companies undoubtedly showcase resilience, innovation, and adaptability, their heavy reliance on the state’s generosity and intervention indicates a market skewed in favor of the few. It calls into question the very tenets of competition, innovation, and consumer choice.
While celebrations surrounding the PSX’s list of top 25 companies are in full swing, Khan’s critique offers a sobering counter-narrative. As we applaud these corporations’ achievements, it is equally vital to recognize the shadow of state influence looming large over many of them. As the corporate sector continues to evolve in Pakistan, one can only hope for a future where businesses thrive based on merit and market dynamics rather than state largesse.